Part 1: Why modern ERM systems make risk managers inflexible Many risk managers know the dilemma: With the introduction of an enterprise risk management system, the work becomes more formally correct, but more rigid in substance. What was originally meant to help capture risks systematically now often restricts the ability to act and to gain insight. Because every change in assumptions, every new distribution, every experiment leaves an audit trail in the production system. Anyone who wants to test how robust a result really is risks an endless discussion about versions and revisions. The result: • Risks are administered instead of understood. • Assumptions persist, even when they're clearly questionable. • Risk managers lose the freedom to test hypotheses, improve models, or learn new methods. What gets lost in the process is exactly what risk management is really about: thinking in mechanisms and understanding dependencies. What's needed, therefore, is a second environment: a protected lab where you're allowed to work exploratively. • Comparing distributions, testing sensitivities, running through cause-and-effect chains. • A place where learning and development are possible before anything goes into production. In the next post, I'll show what this can look like in practice, and how Risk Kit creates exactly this kind of freedom. You'll find the link to Risk Kit in the comments. #ERM #RiskManagement #RiskKit #Simulation #RiskBearingCapacity #GRC
This post was originally published on LinkedIn. View and join the discussion there